Publications summary generator for faculty members profile building
ABSTARCT :
Description: 1. Background: For a much simplified and initial solution, input (publication record) can also be provided in a consolidated single bibtex file. However, it is desirable to provide input as an excel sheet, as mentioned earlier.
2. Description: The proposed solution should be able to crawl different popular academic databases, like Google Scholar, DBLP, etc. Often it is desired to have a publication record in a specific period for submission to various accrediting agencies by HEI's; therefore solution may have a provision for such customized queries.
Expected solutions: The desired solution is required for generating publication summary for faculty profile showcase. Following are the identified inputs and expected outcomes Input: 1. Faculty names as mentioned in their respective academic profile (research papers) in an excel sheet 2. Year-wise publication record in journals which is exportable in words and excel 3. Year-wise publication record in conferences which is exportable in words and excel 4. Customized publication records in a particular duration.
EXISTING SYSTEM :
We use a specific university Web site to conduct our studies, but would argue that the methods are applicable to a wide range of Web sites and intranets. The caveat of such a study is that it is limited to a single Web site and the findings may or may not be transferable to other document collections (see also Kruschwitz et al. [2013]).
Despite this limitation, we argue that our results could provide insights and serve as a baseline for future studies on different Web sites.
The major bottleneck in conducting research into using any form of query logs is the difficulty in getting hold of realistic and large-scale log data, both of which we managed to address in this study.
The structure of the article is as follows. We start by discussing related work in Section 2. We then describe the construction of the log-based profile in Section 3 and give a brief description of our datasets in Section 4. We outline how we apply the acquired model to construct profile-based summaries in Section 5.
DISADVANTAGE :
Generic Outputs: Automated summaries may not capture the unique contributions and nuances of an individual’s work, leading to generic or overly simplified summaries that don’t effectively represent a faculty member’s research impact.
Inaccuracies: The generator may misinterpret or incorrectly summarize research findings, leading to inaccurate representations of a faculty member's work.
Technical Issues: Reliance on software can lead to issues if there are bugs or technical failures, which may disrupt the profile-building process.
Publication Over Quality: Summaries may emphasize the number of publications rather than their impact or quality, promoting a culture that values quantity over meaningful contributions to the field.
Reduced Personal Touch: Automating the summary process may lead to less engagement from faculty members in promoting their work, potentially making profiles feel less authentic or personable.
PROPOSED SYSTEM :
This system will feature a user-friendly interface where faculty can easily manage their profiles by registering and inputting personal information, including research interests and publication history.
The core functionality of the generator lies in its automated summary creation, which utilizes pre-defined templates to generate concise and well-formatted summaries for various publication types, such as journal articles, conference papers, and book chapters.
To enhance the accuracy and relevance of the summaries, the system will include an integrated publications database that allows users to manually enter their works or import them from reputable academic databases like PubMed and Google Scholar.
Additionally, the generator will incorporate impact metrics, such as citation counts and h-index calculations, providing faculty with valuable insights into the reach and significance of their research.
ADVANTAGE :
Automated Process: The generator can quickly compile and format publication lists, saving faculty members valuable time that they can redirect towards research and teaching.
Centralized Information: The generator can help organize publications in a coherent manner, categorizing them by type, date, or relevance, making it easier for others to navigate.
Highlighting Achievements: By generating concise summaries, faculty can effectively highlight key achievements and contributions, making their work more accessible to a broader audience.
Easier Sharing: Faculty can share their publications and achievements with peers, collaborators, and potential employers more easily, fostering connections within their field.
Tailored Outputs: Many generators allow for customization, enabling faculty members to focus on particular areas of interest, themes, or target audiences.
|